Const. James Forcillo has been found guilty of attempted murder in the 2013 shooting death of Sammy Yatim. He was found not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter in the case.
Forcillo’s sentencing and motions will be heard May 16 to 27. The police officer is now suspended with pay because he has been found guilty of a crime, according to Toronto police chief Mark Saunders.
Forcillo, 32, fatally shot Yatim three times while the 18-year-old, armed with a switchblade, stood at the front of an empty, stopped streetcar. Five-and-a-half seconds after Yatim collapsed onto the floor of the streetcar, Forcillo fired six more shots, striking Yatim’s lower body five times.
The charge of attempted murder related to the second volley of shots, which were fired while Yatim was lying on the floor of the streetcar.
The entire incident was captured on video, which was played during the trial.
After the verdicts, Yatim’s mother, Sahar Bahadi, said she would like to be “part of the discussion to change the police training policies when dealing with people in crisis so this painful incident does not repeat again.
“Sami was a young man who had his whole future ahead of him. Because of what the police did, we lost him forever. Nothing in this world will compensate me for the loss of my son, nor will anything bring him back to me, but I would like, for the sake of this great country, that the police remain a source of confidence, security and respect for all people.”
Forcillo remained stoic, but grew increasingly red-faced, as the verdicts were read early this afternoon. His wife moved to stand with him as soon as she was allowed.
Defence lawyer Peter Brauti said his legal team will launch a constitutional challenge to the four-year minimum sentence for attempted murder with a firearm.
Meanwhile, Forcillo remains free on bail.
Julian Falconer, civil lawyer for Yatim’s mother, said police decision-making was so “out of whack” that officer safety was viewed as more important even if someone was only holding a pencil in their hand.
He said that, even though the Toronto Police Service maintain they have implementedrecommendations by retired Supreme Court Justice Frank Iacobucci, the training has remained the same.
However, he added that the days where an officer went to trial when a person in crisis was harmed and “literally enjoyed immunity” were over.
Forcillo had pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder and attempted murder.
Forcillo argued his use of lethal force as a police officer arresting someone committing an illegal act was justified because he had reasonable grounds to believe his life and the lives of others were at risk.
The jury heard weeks of testimony about Yatim’s appearance and behaviour before and after he got on the Dundas streetcar, heading west. Passenger Bridgette McGregor told the jury Yatim slashed his knife at her neck although he did not injure her, and the episode sparked the panicked exodus of passengers from the streetcar.
“I need people to know Yatim was dangerous,” she said. “He was going to kill me.”
Witnesses described Yatim’s erratic behaviour. He exposed himself as he walked behind fleeing passengers, knife in hand. The TTC driver testified he had a conversation with Yatim, in which the teen asked for a phone to call his father.
But the judge warned the jury that evidence from before Forcillo arrived at the scene could only be used as context for the following 50-second confrontation, not to establish Yatim’s state of mind at the time he was shot. The jury could use it to consider whether Yatim was in a state of crisis, and, as the judge added, to provide some circumstantial evidence of his facial expressions and body language that might help the jury in assessing what Forcillo said he observed Yatim doing later.
Characterizing the step Yatim took before he was shot was a key issue during the trial.
Seconds before, Forcillo had issued an ultimatum to Yatim: “Come a step closer and I’ll shoot!”
The Crown repeatedly argued the step was a slow movement forward of 50 centimetres, taking Yatim back to a spot on the streetcar where he’d been standing moments before, not a lunge or charge. Prosecutor Milan Rupic told the jury, it was Yatim’s mocking attitude and failure to obey Forcillo’s commands that caused Forcillo to shoot him, even though Yatim posed no imminent threat and made no move to actually get off the streetcar.
The defence position was that Yatim got himself shot.
Forcillo said the step, coupled with Yatim’s “aggressive” body language and apparent state of excited delirium, led him to believe Yatim was going to attack.
“(Yatim) was in a fight till the end,” Forcillo told the jury.
Forcillo said that, even after Yatim collapsed onto his back after three shots were fired, the youth picked up his knife and appeared to sit up at a 45-degree angle, renewing the attack.
That, he said, was what prompted him to fire the second volley of six shots, five striking Yatim’s lower body.
However, the videos clearly show Yatim never sat up — and the pathologist testified that a bullet to the spine had paralyzed him.
The defence argued Forcillo had an honest, but mistaken perception due to stress and life-threatening circumstances, and called a psychologist to testify about police officers experiencing similar situations.
The Crown maintained Forcillo was lying to justify shooting Yatim who was no imminent threat as he lay on his back on the streetcar.
The trial began in mid-October, lasting more than two months with a break at the end of December.
Forcillo, 32, fatally shot Yatim three times while the 18-year-old, armed with a switchblade, stood at the front of an empty, stopped streetcar. Five-and-a-half seconds after Yatim collapsed onto the floor of the streetcar, Forcillo fired six more shots, striking Yatim’s lower body five times.
The charge of attempted murder related to the second volley of shots, which were fired while Yatim was lying on the floor of the streetcar.
The entire incident was captured on video, which was played during the trial.
After the verdicts, Yatim’s mother, Sahar Bahadi, said she would like to be “part of the discussion to change the police training policies when dealing with people in crisis so this painful incident does not repeat again.
“Sami was a young man who had his whole future ahead of him. Because of what the police did, we lost him forever. Nothing in this world will compensate me for the loss of my son, nor will anything bring him back to me, but I would like, for the sake of this great country, that the police remain a source of confidence, security and respect for all people.”
Forcillo remained stoic, but grew increasingly red-faced, as the verdicts were read early this afternoon. His wife moved to stand with him as soon as she was allowed.
Defence lawyer Peter Brauti said his legal team will launch a constitutional challenge to the four-year minimum sentence for attempted murder with a firearm.
Meanwhile, Forcillo remains free on bail.
Julian Falconer, civil lawyer for Yatim’s mother, said police decision-making was so “out of whack” that officer safety was viewed as more important even if someone was only holding a pencil in their hand.
He said that, even though the Toronto Police Service maintain they have implementedrecommendations by retired Supreme Court Justice Frank Iacobucci, the training has remained the same.
However, he added that the days where an officer went to trial when a person in crisis was harmed and “literally enjoyed immunity” were over.
Forcillo had pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder and attempted murder.
Forcillo argued his use of lethal force as a police officer arresting someone committing an illegal act was justified because he had reasonable grounds to believe his life and the lives of others were at risk.
The jury heard weeks of testimony about Yatim’s appearance and behaviour before and after he got on the Dundas streetcar, heading west. Passenger Bridgette McGregor told the jury Yatim slashed his knife at her neck although he did not injure her, and the episode sparked the panicked exodus of passengers from the streetcar.
“I need people to know Yatim was dangerous,” she said. “He was going to kill me.”
Witnesses described Yatim’s erratic behaviour. He exposed himself as he walked behind fleeing passengers, knife in hand. The TTC driver testified he had a conversation with Yatim, in which the teen asked for a phone to call his father.
But the judge warned the jury that evidence from before Forcillo arrived at the scene could only be used as context for the following 50-second confrontation, not to establish Yatim’s state of mind at the time he was shot. The jury could use it to consider whether Yatim was in a state of crisis, and, as the judge added, to provide some circumstantial evidence of his facial expressions and body language that might help the jury in assessing what Forcillo said he observed Yatim doing later.
Characterizing the step Yatim took before he was shot was a key issue during the trial.
Seconds before, Forcillo had issued an ultimatum to Yatim: “Come a step closer and I’ll shoot!”
The Crown repeatedly argued the step was a slow movement forward of 50 centimetres, taking Yatim back to a spot on the streetcar where he’d been standing moments before, not a lunge or charge. Prosecutor Milan Rupic told the jury, it was Yatim’s mocking attitude and failure to obey Forcillo’s commands that caused Forcillo to shoot him, even though Yatim posed no imminent threat and made no move to actually get off the streetcar.
The defence position was that Yatim got himself shot.
Forcillo said the step, coupled with Yatim’s “aggressive” body language and apparent state of excited delirium, led him to believe Yatim was going to attack.
“(Yatim) was in a fight till the end,” Forcillo told the jury.
Forcillo said that, even after Yatim collapsed onto his back after three shots were fired, the youth picked up his knife and appeared to sit up at a 45-degree angle, renewing the attack.
That, he said, was what prompted him to fire the second volley of six shots, five striking Yatim’s lower body.
However, the videos clearly show Yatim never sat up — and the pathologist testified that a bullet to the spine had paralyzed him.
The defence argued Forcillo had an honest, but mistaken perception due to stress and life-threatening circumstances, and called a psychologist to testify about police officers experiencing similar situations.
The Crown maintained Forcillo was lying to justify shooting Yatim who was no imminent threat as he lay on his back on the streetcar.
The trial began in mid-October, lasting more than two months with a break at the end of December.
No comments:
Post a Comment